Search for: "Clarke v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2013, 4:25 pm
According to the 2002 case Morris v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm
Building a state prison was, as McGeorge School of Law Professor Clark Kelso wrote, an “urgent priority. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
They must now live with that choice and can benefit only under the protection of a patent, not that of a trademark Decision- 7 Cir – GP v Kimberly Clark// [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
Jou v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained DCAS's denial of Petitioner's FOIL requests and, citing Matter of Oustatcher v Clark, 217 AD3d 478, opined that DCAS's rejection of the Petitioners' FOIL request was not "affected by an error of law".Observing that Supreme Court had improperly ordered DCAS to produce information possessed by a different agency, the Financial Information Systems Agency [FISA], the Appellate Division explained that FOIL… [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained DCAS's denial of Petitioner's FOIL requests and, citing Matter of Oustatcher v Clark, 217 AD3d 478, opined that DCAS's rejection of the Petitioners' FOIL request was not "affected by an error of law".Observing that Supreme Court had improperly ordered DCAS to produce information possessed by a different agency, the Financial Information Systems Agency [FISA], the Appellate Division explained that FOIL… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:08 am
Oral argument for Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:18 am
Law Lessons from DEBORAH DOLL V. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:21 am
People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:24 am
Breakdown of Clark v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
See State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:36 am
The current law is now stated in the Equality Act 2010 but the issues in this appeal remain pertinent and are not affected by the revocation of the Regulations. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:12 am
The United States Supreme Court in Chaidez rejected the reasoning of the SJC in Clarke and found that Padilla only applied to prospectively. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
When the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:45 am
The case is Konowaloff v. [read post]
