Search for: "Cohen v. Cohen" Results 741 - 760 of 3,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Glenn Cohen, & Elizabeth Sepper eds., Cambridge Univ., 2017, Forthcoming).Kaari E. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 4:13 pm by Ray Dowd
,  Rowland & Petroff LLP, Sharon Cohen-Levin, A.U.S.A., Southern District of New YorkMember Price:  $125Non-Member Attorney Price: $175Click here to register online! [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:25 pm
Joe Cohen, to go out and inspect the defect, document it, and confirm an opinion as to liability (fault) to the property owner.The insurance tried to settle out cheaply as they sometimes normally do. [read post]
29 May 2016, 6:09 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
 Well, there is civil litigation pending against him in Art Cohen v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:55 am by azatty
Larry Cohen is a great presenter, and he heads a panel of other talented speakers who all know legal ethics inside-out—and who like a great flick. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm by Anthony Gaughan
As Chief Justice Roberts observed in McCutcheon v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
The defendant established that the plaintiff would be unable to prove that he would have been successful in the forfeiture action but for the alleged negligence (see Simmons v Edelstein, 32 AD3d 464, 465; Lichtenstein v Barenbaum, 23 AD3d 440; Edwards v Haas, Greenstein, Samson, Cohen & Gerstein, P.C., 17 AD3d 517, 519). [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:24 am by Eric Goldman
Google * Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Material Support for Terrorists–Cohen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the defendant could have sought to have this Court review Justice Cohen’s refusal to sign the order to show cause (see CPLR 5704[a]; Matter of Greenhaus v Milano , 242 AD2d 383), he instead chose to simply re-apply for an order to show cause before a different Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 3:08 am
The doctrine of continuous representation tolled the statute of limitations at least until that date (see Sommers v Cohen, 14 AD3d 691, 692-693; Gaslow v Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon, 286 AD2d 703, 706; see also Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 169-170). [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:08 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm not sure this would be exactly right in a case where the court actually enforces an arbitral order; I think there would be state action restricting speech, but likely constitutionally permissible state action because the parties had contractually waived their speech rights, see Cohen v. [read post]