Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 741 - 760 of 1,990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This ruling will make it more difficult for public companies defending securities fraud class actions to oppose class certification unless certain indirect evidence of inefficiency is also present.[1] Background In June 2014, the New York Attorney General (“NYAG”) filed suit against Barclays under New York’s Martin Act, alleging that Barclays concealed information about the operation of its private “dark pool” trading system, LX. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:48 pm by Shu-Yi Oei
” From The Guardian: “Wilbur Ross denied on Monday that he had done anything wrong after revelations from the Paradise Papers that he has significant investments in a shipping company that does business with Vladmir Putin’s son-in-law and his sanctioned inner circle. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 3:57 am by Jan von Hein
The AG underlines her position citing the above mentioned CJEU case-law in Factortame and Others (C-221/89), Commission v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am by Legal Beagle
This arrangement/mortgage was concluded in September 2011, and the paperwork is available for public scrutiny at Companies House.At the same time NERR’s parent company Premier Group (Isle of Man) Ltd [PGIOM] was picking up millions of pounds each year in fees for managing and promoting NERR to 3,500 unwitting investors and shareholders. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  He talked David into being the Libertarian vice presidential candidate in 1980, because he was too busy running the family company to do it.) [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
(Communication, para 4.1)It can be seen that the Communication does not stop with policing content. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
(Communication, para 4.1)It can be seen that the Communication does not stop with policing content. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am by Giesela Ruehl
Vedanta has focused their argument on the fact that Article 4 of the Brussels I Regulation Recast does not automatically allow an English-domiciled parent company to be sued in England and, despite the CJEU’s ruling in Owusu v Jackson, there is always discretion as to whether the English court should allow the claims to be tried in England. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:03 am by danny
It does not afford EU citizens fundamental protection. [read post]