Search for: "Cooper v. Cooper"
Results 741 - 760
of 10,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2008, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
., v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:40 am
In the present Feta matter, Case C159/20, Commission v Denmark, the Advocate General Tamara Ćapeta delivered her Opinion on 17 March 2022. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 7:25 pm
If he's cooperative, and there's no real reason to believe he's a threat, you can detain him, but can't handcuff him.Good to know. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:38 pm
Cooper and Dennis R. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:18 pm
Handcuffing another who was cooperative with the police was unreasonable. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
Rickard v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Cooper (test case) [2011] UKSC 60This is a decision of the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Cooper (test case) [2011] UKSC 60This is a decision of the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:59 am
The Court denied cert in Cooper v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:27 pm
Cooper, __ U.S. __, 79 U.S.L.W. 3102 (Jan 7, 2011). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:04 am
Dec. 13, 2023Ulis v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:00 pm
In Cooper v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 12:56 pm
January 14, 2008), the court excused the defendant's waiver of his appeal, and found that the government breached a cooperation agreement by withdrawing its 5K1.1 motion for a reason different from that permitted by the agreement.United States v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Board of Education, Cooper v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Board of Education, Cooper v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
The Chesapeake Project is a cooperative effort to archive primary legal materials in Maryland and Virginia, and is part of the larger Legal Information Preservation Alliance. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
Cooper, No. 10-209, and Missouri v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:25 am
In United States v. [read post]