Search for: "D & F Distributing, Inc." Results 741 - 760 of 1,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
McNeil-PPC, Inc., 2009 WL 1178651, at *3-4 (Pa. [read post]
Additionally, in Tasker Healthcare Group, d/b/a Skinsmart Dermatology, the employer discharged an employee for her Facebook posts regarding work. [read post]
Additionally, in Tasker Healthcare Group, d/b/a Skinsmart Dermatology, the employer discharged an employee for her Facebook posts regarding work. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:04 am
This is done by capturing the IP Addresses associated with distributing and operating the malware. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
" Indeed, the Court has held that courts may properly enjoin the continued distribution of material that had been found to be obscene or to be unprotected commercial speech. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court Act section 1089, subdivision (d), subparagraph (vii), paragraph 2, clause (H), opening paragraph was designated item (I) and a new item (II) was added. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) IEEE patent scorecard for 2008 is out (Innovationpartners) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent databases: 2008 in review (Patent Librarian's Notebook) New kind codes for republished PCT documents (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) The model changes at PatentFreedom; Matsushita is top troll target (IAM) Patent litigation, the ITC, and hardship in the chip industry (IP finance)   Global - Copyright Public domain day 2009 (Creative Commons), (Michael Geist)… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd, Starion… [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
Because the forfeiture “vastly outpace[d] the otherwise available penalties for [defendant’s] criminal activity,” the Ninth Circuit found that it was plain error in violation of the Excessive Fines Clause. [read post]