Search for: "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT" Results 741 - 760 of 8,518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2023, 9:03 pm by Taylor Ross
To assess whether state regulations ensure that teachers are adequately prepared to educate ELs, they surveyed teacher-credentialing requirements across all fifty states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm by Rob Robinson
It is important for cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery professionals operating in the eDiscovery ecosystem to understand the implications of government investigations and the strategies for cooperation. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
” That’s enshrined in Rule 3.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of lawyers in the District of Columbia, where this case is being tried. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At the time this wasn’t a serious problem in the District of Columbia but with the expansion of government employment during and after World War I (and the extension of the federal pension system), it became one as a really large proportion of the District’s population was disqualified. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm by Caroline Hackley
Salary history bans, which prohibit employers from inquiring into a candidate’s pay history, have also been adopted by 28 states, along with Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:46 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Division of Water Rights will award grants to water conservancy districts that administer landscaping conversion incentive programs. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm by John A. Emmons
Wittes sat down with Parloff to discuss the seditious conspiracy trial of five members of the Proud Boys and how it compares with the Oath Keepers case, differences in evidence in the two cases, whether the defendants can get a fair trial in the overwhelmingly Democratic District of Columbia, and more: Wittes sat down with Anna Bower, Anthony Michael Kreis, and Tamar Hallerman to discuss the completion of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s grand jury… [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
The legitimacy of these longstanding and common regulations was recognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:54 pm by Holly
In the fall of 2020, the District Court for the District of Columbia placed an injunction against steps taken by the Secretary of Commerce, through the invocation of the IEEPA, to ban TikTok from the Apple Store. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm by Holly
The request for injunctive relief was held in the District Court for the District of Columbia by Judge Carl Nichols. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
Ten years later, while in private practice, he defended the constitutionality of a District of Columbia gun-control measure in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
TrumpDecision Date: February 18, 2022 The United States district court for the district of Columbia ruled that “only in the most extraordinary circumstances could a court not recognize that the First Amendment protects a president’s speech”, and that “even Presidents could not avoid liability for speech that falls outside the expansive reach of the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm by Richard Frank
 While the California local government plaintiffs had filed their lawsuit in state court, the industry defendants attempted to remove the case to federal court, hoping for a more favorable judicial reception there. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
The district court had concluded that the maps likely violated the Voting Rights Act by suppressing Black votes. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:44 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the states’ request to join the case, the states came to the Supreme Court on Dec. 19, asking the justices to keep the policy in place. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 2:04 pm by William Appleton
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in a case to determine if federal prosecutors can lawfully charge three Jan. 6 defendants with corrupt obstruction of an official proceeding. [read post]