Search for: "DOES 1-50 BEING PARTIES TO NAMED LATER"
Results 741 - 753
of 753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 11:01 am
Federal law does not require the use of either approach for any specific domestic relations purpose, and it is up to the drafters of any order to determine how best to achieve the purposes for which pension benefits are being divided. [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:33 am
[Continued from the previous Part 1 and Part 2.] [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[38] It is interesting to note that these remedies seem to be completely disjointed from both the extent of the harm and the culpability of the parties named in the code. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:54 pm
Bosnia-Herzegovina), paras. 50, 71). [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Let's say that John Doe, a senior master sergeant in the Air Force, is being sued for divorce and military pension division by Mary Doe, his wife. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
The penthousestore.com website launched on or about January 1, 2003, and has been continuously active since that date. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
§ 1125(d)(1)(A). [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:15 am
It also cautioned the government not to disclose a list of 30 names, only to ask for permission to add 30 more at a later date. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
He was sentenced to 50 years in prison. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 12:25 pm
Does the State Legislature have the same power to enact laws that take effect 5 years retroactive to its being signed into law as done by this court's ruling against me? [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 8:38 am
It discusses the many reasons why a third party is necessary, it presents issues such a party would have to address, and it mentions a few of the mechanics of creating and operating a new third party. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 8:57 am
Another example of the junction between dishonesty and the federal judiciary arises when courts allow parties to get away with dishonesty, sometimes truly gross dishonesty, and sometimes, by the way, make up facts in order to allow a party to get away with dishonesty -- a phenomenon which conjoins courts' own dishonesty with allowing parties to get away with being dishonest. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
Results 1. [read post]
