Search for: "David A Church" Results 741 - 760 of 2,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2018, 4:55 am by Jim Sedor
David Knezek in a Democratic primary race that few thought would be competitive. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Scott Pryor profpryor Campbell contracts bankruptcy law & religion Gowri Nanayakkara gowri_nana Canterburgy Christ Church (UK)       Rhonda Powell DrRLPowell Canterbury (NZ)       César Cuauhtémoc Garcia Hernandez crimmigration Capital       Ambreena Manji AmbreenaManji Cardiff       Michelle Adams mvadams12 Cardozo Constitutiona [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:29 am by assoulineberlowe
  The church will lease the new parcel from Off Lease and continue to hold services in the existing church building pursuant to a lease David negotiated. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:00 am by Ruth Levush
Matthew Dyson and David Ibbetson, Law and legal process: substantive law and procedure in English legal history (2013). [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by SHG
When the Roberts court ruled that the First Amendment prohibited holding the Westboro Baptist Church liable for displaying anti-gay signs outside a military funeral, its rationale would equally protect Revolutionary Communist Party demonstrators holding anti-Christian signs outside the Westboro Baptist Church. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am by David Kopel
State may regulate, but not nullify, the right to bear arms.Today a 2-1 Ninth Circuit panel held that Hawaii's near-total prohibition on the carrying of handguns for lawful self-defense violates the Second Amendment right to bear arms. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “[w]hile serving on the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
President Donald Trump is expected to announce his nomination today for the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:33 am
Contents include:J Ann Tickner & Jacqui True, A Century of International Relations Feminism: From World War I Women's Peace Pragmatism to the Women, Peace and Security Agenda Joseph MacKay & Christopher David LaRoche, Why Is There No Reactionary International Theory? [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Barrett graduated magna cum laude from Rhodes College, a liberal arts college in Tennessee affiliated with the Presbyterian Church, in 1994. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 3:57 am by David Kopel
The swearer had to abjure "taking arms" against the king's government and swore "that I will not at any time endeavour any alteration of the government either in church or state. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Similarly, Kennedy’s willingness to join with former Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and David Souter in protecting women’s right to choose in the 1992 Casey decision was important, to put it mildly.Even so, there were more than a few items on the other side of the ledger, including Kennedy’s cowardly vote in Bush v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The Seattle Times says that David George, the pastor of a church in Oakville, Washington, is being hailed as a hero for stopping a deadly shooting and carjacking spree at a Walmart. [read post]
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 6:30 am by Dariely Rodriguez
Citing Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye Inc. v Hialeah, the Supreme Court found that the commission violated the First Amendment’s free exercise clause by demonstrating “clear and impermissible hostility” toward Phillips’ religious objections. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am by Elizabeth Clark
Smith was refined first in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
The main question raised in Masterpiece Cakeshop had to do with the Free Speech Clause, and the prohibition on "compelled speech": Would requiring a baker to make a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding (even one without specific wording or symbolism, such as a rainbow design) be compelling the baker to engage in speech, and thus violate the First Amendment? [read post]