Search for: "David W. White" Results 741 - 760 of 901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm by John Dean
McConnell is wrong making this incident sound Nixon-like, for neither Nixon nor anyone in the Nixon White House knew that these activities at the Watergate were going to be undertaken. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am by John Dean
McConnell is wrong making this incident sound Nixon-like, for neither Nixon nor anyone in the Nixon White House knew that these activities at the Watergate were going to be undertaken. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Scalia was confirmed unanimously in 1986; Ginsburg was confirmed by a Senate vote of 96-3 in 1993; but beginning with George W. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 11:47 pm
The state that famously carried out 152 executions under Governor George W. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:41 am by Moria Miller
With the support of both labor unions and business interests, President George W. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:55 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Omar Abdel-Baqui and David Luhnow report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
., will argue for Secretary of State John Kerry and for the White House. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Professor David Faigman and others have attempted to articulate the scientific basis (if any) for opinion testimony in health-effects litigation that a give person’s disease has been caused by an exposure or condition. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
The Executive Branch’s Reinterpretation of the 2002 Iraq AUMF The 2002 Iraq AUMF was passed at the behest of President George W. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
But in this case, because of the subject matter, they are all white men. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Muselevich JJett Appraisals Appraisal - Residential / Commerical 3 Richard Maltz David R. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm by admin
Recently, two lawyers wrote an article in a legal trade magazine about excluding epidemiologic evidence in civil litigation.[1] The article was wildly wide of the mark, with several conceptual and practical errors.[2] For starters, the authors discussed Rule 702 as excluding epidemiologic studies and evidence, when the rule addresses the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]