Search for: "Deal v. USA"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:18 pm
This was precisely the case in the BMG v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am
Davila, the Court will consider the remedy in a plea-bargained criminal case when a federal judge had some role leading up to agreement on the plea deal; the third case, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
How will the Supreme Court deal with the Cinar v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In Lafler v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:06 pm
Sisley Cosmetics USA, Inc., Case No. 7:12-cv-07867 (S.D. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 7:45 am
Engedal v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am
In 2010 in the USA, 9 people were killed due to firearms for every 100,000. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
The Justice and Security Bill in the House of Lords The second major Government Bill in the spotlight this week was the Justice and Security Bill, which (amongst other things) provides for Closed Material Procedures (CMPs) – the “secret courts” bill that longtime readers of this blog will be familiar with (the posts dealing with this subject can be found here). [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
The debate over dealing with the fiscal cliff has placed the Norquist pledge front and center. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
The Judge therefore found that, by virtue of Lilly’s European patent department dealing with Lilly USA’s patents from Lilly UK’s site, and particularly the role of Lilly’s representative before the EPO, Lilly USA has a place of business in England for the purposes English jurisdictional rules. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
An English court should express no view about the law of the USA. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:50 am
EMPLOYERS NEED TO BE VERY CAREFUL IN THE MANNER IN WHICH THEY DEAL WITH THEIR EMPLOYEES. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:17 am
Dorr v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:13 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 1:50 pm
Fortunately, the Supreme Court of Canada completely ignored this submission.However, that said, there is some arguably rogue and wrong but often cited appellate law in the USA (Bridgeport v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
The first, The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, et al. v. [read post]
