Search for: "Discovery Benefits, Inc." Results 741 - 760 of 1,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am by Bob Eisenbach
“Intellectual Property Rights” were defined to include, among others, the Debtor’s copyrights, patentable and unpatentable inventions, discoveries, designs, technology, trademarks, and trade secrets. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am by Bob Eisenbach
“Intellectual Property Rights” were defined to include, among others, the Debtor’s copyrights, patentable and unpatentable inventions, discoveries, designs, technology, trademarks, and trade secrets. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 7:10 am
Consequently, the court held that Defendants had not met their burden of showing that the cost of the proposed discovery to Defendants outweighed the benefit to Plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 1:55 pm by Lynn Sessions and David M. Brown
On November 13, 2015, the chief administrative law judge (“ALJ”) handling the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC” or “Commission”) complaint against LabMD Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 12:32 pm by Eric Turkewitz
Sued his insurance company, the Southern States Police Benevolent Association, Inc., which issues polices of insurance. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 10:55 am by Steven Boutwell
  Power Blocks 1 and 2 are expected to be acquired by Entergy New Orleans and Entergy Arkansas, Inc., respectively. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:13 pm
 Notwithstanding the foregoing, inasmuch as it is uncontroverted that defendant had defended the instant action for three years during which time it had made numerous motions, engaged in discovery practice, and repeatedly appeared in court, defendant is entitled to recover the reasonable attorney's fees it incurred in its defense of the instant action up to the date of discontinuance, in order to eliminate any possible prejudice attributable to the discontinuance (see Carter v… [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by Alexis Yee-Garcia
Travis Laster landed another blow against M&A litigation disclosure only settlements with his decision in In re Aruba Networks Inc. [read post]
  Put simply, to what extent will the responsible UK court look across the Atlantic for guidance and be able to benefit from it? [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
., Inc., in which the court needed to determine whether a trial court’s admission of a subsequent treating physician’s testimony required a new trial. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:21 am
  We aren’t talking about a scientific discovery regarding potassium. [read post]