Search for: "Distinctive Brands, Inc." Results 741 - 760 of 1,242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit (Green Patent Blog)… [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm by Coral Beach
Inc. and that company in turn distributed the peas to hotels, restaurants and institutional foodservice operations in British Columbia. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 11:12 pm by Steve Baird
By the way, are you able to identify the brand of drone shown in the photo above? [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:04 am by John L. Welch
And, the Board noted, "consumers may automatically equate a domain name with a brand name. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am by Cicely Wilson
The court further concluded that Louboutin’s trademark, consisting of a red, lacquered outsole on a high fashion woman’s shoe, has acquired limited “secondary meaning” as a distinctive symbol that identified the Louboutin brand. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am by Cicely Wilson
The court further concluded that Louboutin’s trademark, consisting of a red, lacquered outsole on a high fashion woman’s shoe, has acquired limited “secondary meaning” as a distinctive symbol that identified the Louboutin brand. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Spicy IP)   Italy Pre-emptive remedies in Italy (PatLit)   Japan Fair Trade Commission orders music copyright group to end monopolistic practice (ContentAgenda) (ContentAgenda)   Malawi Are consumers in Malawi just more brand-savvy? [read post]
The Fourth Circuit held that the toys constituted a successful parody that was similar to, yet clearly distinct from, the registered mark. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If a Section 15 affidavit is mistaken (whether or not knowingly false), then the requirements of Section 15 haven’t been met, and thus courts should not accord the affected registration an irrebutable presumption of distinctiveness. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm by Randolph J. May
Fox Television Stations, Inc. that the APA makes no distinction “between initial agency action and subsequent action undoing or revising that action. [read post]