Search for: "Doe 39" Results 741 - 760 of 10,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 11:51 am by Jeralyn
If Duff does not claim, and has no evidence to support Schapelle knew the drugs were in her boogie board when she went to Bali, what is the purpose of this book? [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:47 am
 While these matters generally invohe lead exposures that exceed Proposition 65 standards, and which need to be corrected, your manner of pursuing them does not appear to be in the public interest. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:56 am
" If the committee, which reviews administration regulations, does not act within a review period of about three months, O'Malley could put the procedures into effect. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:38 pm
Let's forget for a moment how in hell this is supposed to be Constitutional, what happens when it does NOT pass? [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:30 am
    This time, the measure is being carried by Missoula Democrat David Wanzenreid with supporters of the measure saying that the death penalty is costly, unfair, and does not serve as a deterrent. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:13 am
The ruling comes less than a month after prosecutors acknowledged that DNA evidence does not implicate Blair and shows that another man, now deceased, is a plausible suspect in the girl's death. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 6:53 am
  There are 7 more not listed on the letter who have pledged to vote against any bill that does not have a robust public plan. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 7:01 pm
Today's Atlanta Journal Constitution ran a front page article exposing the slimy underside to Georgia's Car Title Loan industry. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 9:58 pm
A person does not violate this section if the person's disorderly conduct was caused by an epileptic seizure. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 11:25 pm
I've received a few interesting comments and e-mails on an earlier post ("Why Hawaii Can't Vote On Property Taxes") about the Ohana Kauai property tax charter amendment and how it was declared unconstitutional by a 3-2 Hawaii Supreme Court.Here's one that I thought was worth moving from the below-the-fold comment section:I know you're addressing strict legal interpretations here at inversecondemnation.com, but I… [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
 It's not a claim against actual assets.Since the government does not actually segregate Social Security tax collections, it simply adds it to the federal budget sheet. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 7:05 am
  Does this have any implications for consumer law? [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:28 am
That's the title of Tom Baxter's article for Southern Political Report. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
' Does Bauer really believe this nonsense? [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:49 pm
Does O'Neill share the common viewpoint of politicians on the right, that cheating is just fine if you get away with it, and "insignificant" if you get caught? [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:15 am
Since Tom thought it important enough to e-mail me about it, which he only does with big news, I'm thinking there may be something to this. [read post]