Search for: "Doe v. City of Chicago" Results 741 - 760 of 1,154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2023, 7:21 am by Russell Knight
Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, 847 NE 2d 810 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 6th Div. 2006 The first test of “damage to students, faculty, or the school” holds teachers to a high standard. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
An employee need not be a “prevailing party” to be eligible for an attorney’s fees award under ERISA’s fee-shifting provision (§1132(g)(1)), held the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision, finding that courts may award fees and costs to a fee claimant so long as he or she has achieved “some degree of success on the merits” (May 24, 2010).Lewis v City of Chicago (Dkt No 08-974). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It does not have to mean that, though, and it did not this time. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
City of Chicago in 2010 – a trend that some Supreme Court ignorati suspected might doom this case. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
In light of that reality, the question must be whether a set of rules does or does not work -- a results-based approach. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Collective Scienter does not apply to false patent marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Collective Scienter does not apply to false patent marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:49 am by Lana Ulrich
City of Chicago case, when it ruled that the 14th Amendment prevents the states as well as the federal government from infringing on the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 12:26 pm by Just Security
Doe; Brazilian Worker Center, Inc; La Colaborativa v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
City of Chicago. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 12:03 pm by John Jascob
In an issue of first impression, the court also held that the RMBS trust certificates, which were governed by pooling and servicing agreements, were exempt from the Trust Indenture Act (Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 They also challenged an Uber blog post stating that all uberX vehicles were “licensed by the city of Chicago, and driven by a licensed chauffeur. [read post]