Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan" Results 741 - 760 of 1,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2022, 8:05 am by David Oxenford
  Beyond issues of bad publicity, attacked candidates are often reluctant to sue because of the New York Times v Sullivan standards that make it hard to prove defamation of a public figure. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On December 29, 2022, the Second Circuit issued its highly anticipated opinion on remand in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court dismissed the case under Rule 12 for failure to state a claim, but the Court of Appeals (Sullivan, Chin and Bianco) reinstates the claim.How does this case fare under Littlejohn and Vega? [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Laurence H. Tribe
Dominion also won its argument that it does not need to prove that what Fox News broadcasted about it was harmful. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   In reaching this latter conclusoin, Judge Sullivan rejected the applicability of the 1928 Zeig v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:45 am by Sullivan & Galleshaw, LLP
Sullivan’s Court provides general legal information only, is not intended as legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
 Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964), this form of political speech must remain `uninhibited, robust, and wide-open. [read post]
13 May 2007, 6:01 pm
The big news tomorrow today is going to be oral argument scheduled before the Supreme Court in Elizabeth Kerrigan et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court says that plaintiff did not speak out as a citizen and that, even if he did, his speech was not on a matter of public concern.The case is Shara v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
While Canadian judges, like their Commonwealth siblings, are unwilling to adopt a New York Times v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
 Yesterday's Ninth Circuit hearing in Mohamed v. [read post]