Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan" Results 741 - 760 of 1,729
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2015, 9:01 am
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove "actual malice" to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:01 am by Lee E. Berlik
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove “actual malice” to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Sullivan, state tort law of defamation has been limited by federal constitutional principles. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
” Commenting on the absence of any stock certificate supporting Zwarycz’s claim, the court wrote: The mere fact that a corporation did not issue any stock certificates does not preclude a finding that a particular individual has the rights of a shareholder (see Kun v Fulop, 71 AD3d at 833; French v French, 288 AD2d 256, 256; Blank v Blank, 256 AD2d 688). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
But Brady is not self-enforcing; failure to comply with Brady does not expose the prosecutor to any personal risk. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Fifty years ago, in a landmark judgment (New York Times v Sullivan), the United States Supreme Court constitutionalised defamation law. [read post]