Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 741 - 760
of 15,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
The court stated that depending on financial information that was yet to come from Paul, the child-support mod might be made retroactive to June 1, 2006. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm
before the end of the 2011 Fiscal Year, before October 1). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
The Protecting Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (the “Act” or “PPWFA”) of 2014 was passed on October 23, 2014 and is under Congressional review. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
Events 24 February 2015, “Does Privacy Matter? [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm
Oct. 1, 2013) * Pearson Educ., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:52 am
In an 8-1 decision announced Thursday in Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:52 am
In an 8-1 decision announced Thursday in Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
App. 695, 702 (1) (556 SE2d 50) (2001). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Illinois: At Chicago City Hall, the Legislative Branch Rarely Does Much LegislatingProPublica – Mick Dumke | Published: 2/25/2019 From 2011 through 2018, Chicago Ald. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
[1] 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:05 pm
FIGURE 1: Examples of Plaintiff’s Attorney Investigation Tweets and Articles Figure 1 provides examples of the plaintiffs’ attorney investigation announcements we examine. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:17 am
It does not matter that B filed first. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:37 am
Oklahoma recently passed a tort reform bill into law which will be effective November 1, 2009. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:31 pm
Monday, March 25, 2024. 12-1:00 pm ET (New York) / 4-5:00 pm GMT (Dakar) / 5-6:00 pm CET (Paris). [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 8:40 pm
We do not belabor the Ninth Circuit’s holding that “Rule 23 does not preclude a defendant from bringing a ‘preemptive’ motion to deny certification. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
Searches of the following specific items have been upheld without particularized suspicion: (1) the contents of a traveler's briefcase and luggage, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:00 pm
The full judgment can be found here. [1] R(Miller and others) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin) [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:10 pm
On February 1, 2010, ALJ Carl C. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:56 am
Why does your "obligation" exist only if (1) there's a retrial, (2) at which the defendant is again convicted, (3) and there's an appeal, (4) that comes to you? [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Does it really make sense? [read post]
