Search for: "Does 1 - 57" Results 741 - 760 of 3,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2021, 5:21 am by Rose Hughes
The High Court decision in Illumina v MGI ([2021] EWHC 57 (Pat) hit the IP headlines for its application of the Supreme Court decision in Regeneron v Kymab ([2020] UKSC 27) (see IPKat: Illumina v MGI Part 1: Mr Justice Birss on sufficiency, DNA sequencing and chocolate teapots). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:53 am
Marlea Clarke, Department of Political Science, University of Victoria, Canada5:30pm9:30amPanel 1: Debt SustainabilityProf. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
However, a 28 percent federal corporate income tax rate combined with Biden’s proposal to tax long-term capital gains and qualified dividends at an ordinary income tax rate of 39.6 percent for income earned over $1 million would make the top integrated tax rate on corporate income in the U.S. the highest in the OECD at 62.7 percent (see Figure 3).[13] If the Biden tax plan were fully implemented, the U.S. rank on the Tax Foundation’s International Tax Competitiveness Index… [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Cross-border Tax System Changes Made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act How Does GILTI Work? [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
Beyond conducting the usual baseline investigative steps like searching in law enforcement databases, agents may also use information purchased from commercial databases, use and recruit human sources (discussed in more detail below), and engage in any surveillance that does not require a court order. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 7:33 am by Kevin Kaufman
Repealing the worldwide allocation relative to current law would result in a tax hike, but at the same time, allocating U.S. expenses using a worldwide apportionment rule does not make sense if the goal is to have a territorial tax system. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
  Like Marxist-Leninist systems in the 21st century, private organizations that believe themselves a necessary component of markets driven vanguards are working toward the implementation of comprehensive data driven systems of punishments and rewards grounded in assessments measured against a preferred ideal. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 4:58 am by Rose Hughes
The High Court decision in Illumina v MGI ([2021] EWHC 57 (Pat)) is the first to take an in depth look at the thorny issue of sufficiency since last year's Supreme Court decision in Regeneron v Kymab ([2020] UKSC 27) (IPKat). [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
It does not need to be chilled below normal refrigeration. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:37 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Rome II Regulation[1] governs matters of non-contractual obligations. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Colette Allen is the host of Newscast on Dr Thomas Bennett and Professor Paul Wragg’s The Media Law Podcast (@MediaLawPodcast). [1] These allegations were struck out for being “irrelevant” [46, 57, 62], “vague” [58] and “inadequately pleaded” [48], Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2020] E.W.H.C (Ch) 1058 [2] It is worth noting that the court found in favour of the defendants in all three of the examples listed. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
They take many forms and go by different names, including term sheets, memoranda of understanding, commitment letters, and award letters[1] (this paper will use the term “letter of intent” to refer to all such pre-contract documents). [read post]