Search for: "Does 1-100" Results 741 - 760 of 14,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2011, 10:57 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Meanwhile, in late February 2010, Lannett submitted its own NDA (NDA No. 201517) to FDA for Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution, 100 mg per 5 mL (20 mg per mL), which NDA was not granted a 6-month priority review as was Roxane’s NDA. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It was held that it would seem somewhat absurd if making a minor amendment were to enable objections outside A 100 EPC 1973 to be raised which had no connection with the amendment itself (Case Law, 6th edition 2010, VII.D.4.2; see in particular decision T 301/87 [headnote 1, 3.6-8]).[6] In the present case, the feature “steady state” has not been added or amended during opposition proceedings but was already present in claim 1 as granted […]. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 am by Roel van Woudenberg
However the Enlarged Board of Appeal also held that:"This negative effect does not apply to European patents granted before 1 July 2017 and European patent applications which were filed before that date and are still pending" (ibid).4. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 1:17 pm by Sam Turco
Then start walking 1 mile today, 2 miles tomorrow, and eat a healthy diet. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am by Roel van Woudenberg
(henceforth jointly referred to as opponent O2) citing Articles 100(a) and (b) EPC.III. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:57 am
Chrysler does not deserve aid until it can present compelling new-generation vehicles. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:49 pm
More Web Resources: Oklahoma attorney embezzles over $1 million dollars from clients Charges filed against Schraeder and Anton [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 7:20 am by Jessica Kroeze
Such communication is required by Rule 100(1) in conjunction with Rule 79(1) EPC.4. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 7:20 am by Jessica Kroeze
Such communication is required by Rule 100(1) in conjunction with Rule 79(1) EPC.4. [read post]
Your gift of $50, $100, $200 or $500 will help JURIST to keep its legal news and commentary free and accessible to a worldwide public. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:47 am by Stanley D. Baum
If the plan fails to comply with these requirements, it will be subject to: (1) the taxes, remedies, and penalties that generally apply to a plan that does not comply with the requirements of chapter 100 of the Code (generally, an excise tax of $100 per day per individual discriminated against for each day the plan does not comply with the requirements), (2) the civil remedies of part 7 of ERISA (a civil action to enjoin a noncompliant act or practice,… [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:05 pm
Also, wash your hands before touching the patient, and make sure every caregiver does too. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 12:55 pm by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
TechieKat Veronica Rodrigues shared the event report about Day 1 and Day 2. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Does “whoever” imply a person, and not a machine? [read post]