Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2019, 5:30 am
But could a single state secure a GDPR adequacy determination even though the United States has not obtained a full adequacy decision? [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:18 pm
Copyright Office. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:01 pm
State v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
See, Gideon v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:27 am
To reverse, we must find `(1) error, (2), that is plain, . . . (3) that affects [the defendant's] substantial rights,’ and `(4) [that] seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
It does not matter all that much that as law, or legal practice, either the lawsuit or the Senate Bill are laughable. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
Access does, however, take issue with certain facts alleged by plaintiff, and asserts that:1. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
The Decision: On January 6, 2010, the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (the “Court”) issued an order in the case of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
He says there is recent evidence of the Downing Street press office being misleading in its announcements. 1228: Lady Hale tells Lord Garnier QC he is out of time. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
” 4 No, the consent decrees fully endorse fractional licensing. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
” State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
IPSO Rulings A ruling and two resolution statements have been published by IPSO’s Complaints Committee this week: 03137-18 Ashton v Daily Mail, principle 1 (accuracy), no breach after investigation 03996-18 Sanusi v Liverpool Echo, principles 1 and 2 (privacy), no breach after investigation 04524-18 McAlpine v The Scottish Sun, principles, 2, 3 (harassment), 4 (intrusion into grief and shock) and 10 (clandestine devices and subterfuge), no… [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
(g) there is any other basis consistent with the constitutions of this State and the United States for the exercise of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
., Plaintiffs,v.NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-1, et al., Defendants.No. 1:16-cv-00229-JDL.United States District Court, D. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
The Department stated: “The United States disagrees with plaintiffs’ unsupported assertion that the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause does not apply to the Vice President in his official capacity as the President of the Senate” (p.4 n. 1 & see also p.6). [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service are affirmed over claims that: 1) the Wild Bird Act does not apply to captive-bred birds; 2) the Act is unconstitutionally vague because it does not define the term personal pet; and 3) the jury instruction given by the trial court was incorrect. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
This section does not prohibit a person who possesses a handgun from entering the licensed premises for a limited time for the specific purpose of either: 1. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 5:09 pm
As has been well-documented, the United States in the middle of an “epidemic” involving the abuse of prescription and non-prescription opioids. [read post]
