Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 741 - 760
of 4,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
So clause 41(2) says “A trade mark is taken not to be capable of distinguishing … only if …. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:46 pm
Conversely, all the other brands mentioned accounted for only 13% of the sample; the highest of these, Lindt, reached 1.7% and no other brand reached 1%. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
” While the list is by no means exhaustive, it does provide some hot topics for organizations to consider in 2017. 1. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
” While the list is by no means exhaustive, it does provide some hot topics for organizations to consider in 2017. 1. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:01 pm
Quevas, 81 NY2d 41, People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:55 pm
It does not. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am
Moreover, referring to G 2/98 (OJ EPO 2001, 413, Reasons, points 4, 6.6 and 6.7), the opposition division concluded that the "intermediate generalisation in granted claim 1 with respect to the disclosure of priority document D16 does not give rise to the claiming of a limited number of clearly defined alternative subject-matters" and thus that the "subject—matter of claim 1 was only entitled to the filing date". [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:53 am
How does/should a court reconcile Rule 41(g) with the government’s pursuit of criminal forfeiture when the property at issue is intangible, and can therefore be copied? [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:06 am
Reg. 35/08 came into force in September 2008 but does not apply to accidents prior to September 1, 2008. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:25 pm
” FAR 52.225-1. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:54 am
Id. at 1. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:17 pm
Introduction 1. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
(Docket No. 1 ¶ 5.) [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
Scheiner, Attorneys for the Injured, at 1-800-646-1210. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
Scheiner, Attorneys for the Injured, at 1-800-646-1210. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:30 am
Hint: just because you can figure out the date of the quote, does not mean the president at that time wrote it. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
One of the more delicate situations a professional representative can encounter is when his/her client does not settle the bills. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:50 am
(If you are new to the Unitary Patent, Merpel regrets that the IPKat has not written about it much for a while, because there has not been much in the way of news, but relevant posts are this from the 2014 Fordham conference, this on the applicable law, and this on Spain's challenge to the legality of it all.)Well, Merpel has now received from a number of sources a document "Proposals for the level of renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect", submitted by the President… [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 10:38 am
Dlugash, 41 NY2d 725, 726 (1977). [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
However, as a seemingly precautionary measure, the patent proprietor decides to 'eliminate' the technical effect of improved transparency by submitting an auxiliary request in which the emulsion is limited to application in Yogurt (which is non-transparent).Does the latter strategy work? [read post]
