Search for: "Does 1-51" Results 741 - 760 of 3,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Roberto Gargarella Introduction The Collaborative Constitution is one of the most interesting contributions produced by the legal academia in recent years.[1] It is a clear, easy to read and at the same time profound book, in which its author, Professor Aileen Kavanagh, investigates what is the best and most justified way to protect rights in a democracy. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 12:49 pm
The chart does not yield an easy answer to my question, but it does show that at least one frequently told story about extreme nominees is not true: a friendly Senate is no guarantee that a president will choose an extreme nominee. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 5:17 pm
Does that mean Clinton broke the law by not reporting? [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:59 am by Paul D. Knothe
  Likewise, a former inmate’s being granted relief under the new law does not permit them to own, possess, or have in their custody or control any firearm. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:32 pm
That would translate into something like a 51-47-1 split (one percent for various third party candidates), which is not unusual for presidential elections. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
Although this does NOT mean you should avoid rendering calls-to-action as graphics as well. [read post]
The Texas law does have limitations, including an exclusion banning open carry on the premises of restaurants and bars that make more than 51 percent of their gross profits from alcohol sales, and, significant for retailers, a provision that allows businesses to prohibit open carry on their premises, as long as they post certain specified signage alerting customers of the ban. [read post]