Search for: "Does 15-96" Results 741 - 760 of 1,000
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 11(5) provides explicitly that discharge from custody pursuant to Article 11(4) does not preclude subsequent re-arrest and extradition of that person upon later delivery of the extradition request and supporting documents. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
One main and 15 auxiliary requests were filed together with the statement of grounds of appeal. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
As to an offense against a law relating to taxation, customs duties, exchange control, or other revenue matters, Article 2(6) provides that extradition may not be refused because the law of the Requested State does not impose the same kind of tax or duty or does not have the same kind of regulation as the law of the Requesting State. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In its response the applicant requested oral proceedings (OPs) to be held if the ED considered refusing the application.On October 31, 2006, the ED summoned the applicant to OPs to be held on January 15, 2007. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Howard Knopf
That being said, parties are reminded that the Board does not need all existing relevant information to set fair tariffs. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This period may be extended, upon the Requesting State’s application, for up to an additional 15 days after the apprehension of the person sought. 5. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 4 bars extradition when the person sought has been tried and convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings against the person sought. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Finally, Article II(4) provides that if extradition is granted for one or more extraditable offenses, it shall also be granted for any other offense specified in the request even if that offense does not meet the minimum penalty requirement, provided that all other extradition requirements are met. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:00 pm
  What does this mean for all of us on the roads across the country everyday? [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Netherlands, Netherlands Antilles, and Aruba International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 24, 1980, Date-Signed September 15, 1983, Date-In-Force MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 97TH CONGRESS 1st Session SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, May 28, 1981. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 5 bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the authorities in the Requested State have decided not to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings against the person sought. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 6 bars extradition when the person sought has been found guilty, convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the offense for which extradition is requested, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm by Bexis
”  636 F.3d at 95 (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts §15, comment a (1964)).Current West Virginia law, however, requires “actual physical impairment” for battery. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 2(6) provides that in the case of fiscal offenses, extradition may not be refused on the ground that the law of the Requested State does not contain a tax, duty, customs, or exchange regulation of the same kind as the law of the Requesting State. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 15 provides, to the extent permitted under the law of the Requested State, for that State to seize and surrender to the Requesting State property related to the offense for which extradition is requested. [read post]