Search for: "Edwards v. Means"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
Were the constitutional doubts of the 1952 statute not strong enough, the implementing regulations that define “vocation” are even less neutral: Religious vocation means a formal lifetime commitment, through vows, investitures, ceremonies, or similar indicia, to a religious way of life. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:42 pm
Gregg v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
That means it applies to nearly all the cases now on the Eastern District’s docket, and the venue for hundreds of those cases was likely improper. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
And Quinta Jurecic posted this week's Lawfare Podcast: Edward Jay Epstein on “How America Lost Its Secrets. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
The Problem of Hierarchy --Berreman v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am
But the opening of Judge Korman’s opinion in Abidor v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Apple Inc., No. 16-913 (“plain and ordinary meaning”) Is it a Patent Case? [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
De Niz Robles v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
According to the Washington Post, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Edward R. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:58 am
(That’s from Edwards v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
”) Edwards v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 8:44 am
Key ongoing internal project v. new client project. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:11 am
Palm Bay Imports Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm
That doesn’t mean that there can never be any potential consequences for whistleblowing. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
Orin Kerr responded to April Doss’s earlier post on United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:08 am
When it comes to the trust deficit regarding U.S. surveillance internationally, exhibit A is the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
