Search for: "Employment and Labor Group"
Results 741 - 760
of 12,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2023, 1:12 pm
LinkedIn Health Care Risk Management & Operations Group, HR & Benefits Update Compliance Group, and/or Coalition for Responsible Health Care Policy Group. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:49 pm
If you have questions, please contact a member of the McNees Labor & Employment group. [read post]
Another One: The NLRB Revives Standard That Employees Are Protected When Advocating for Nonemployees
1 Sep 2023, 12:30 pm
The Board went on to explain the reasoning underlying the Amnesty International decision did not comport with work realities, where it is entirely reasonable for statutory employees to support nonemployees for mutual aid or protection of the statutory employees where the two groups work together for the same employer. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
The Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA) states that it is compulsory for an employer to provide unpaid maternity leave for a period of 4 months. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 2:47 pm
The current proposed regulations appear susceptible to the same challenges raised by employer groups to the Obama-era regulations that were withdrawn. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 10:12 am
Some groups have signaled an intention to challenge the proposed rulemaking through litigation, which will likely follow. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
LinkedIn Health Care Risk Management & Operations Group, HR & Benefits Update Compliance Group, and/or Coalition for Responsible Health Care Policy Group. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:58 am
We have an active trust and estates group, and an active labor and employment group. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:51 am
For questions regarding adverse impact calculations, reach out to any of the McNees Labor & Employment team. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:07 am
The employment lawyers at the Resnick Law Group represent workers in New Jersey and New York who have suffered losses because of unlawful workplace practices. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
If the work policy of her employer disadvantages women (undergoing treatment) as a group, she might also succeed in bringing an indirect sex discrimination claim against her employer. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:02 pm
Justice Kavanaugh raised this concern during the October 2022 oral argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 12:24 pm
Regulators have recently released a significant amount of information related to group health plan compliance with the Mental Health Parity and Equity Addiction Act of 2008, as amended (MHPAEA). [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:39 am
As we previously wrote about here at TIPS, an ongoing lawsuit brought on behalf of national and local restaurant industry associations seeks to invalidate the Department of Labor’s new regulation codifying the “80/20” rule—the Department’s longstanding enforcement position that an employer cannot take a tip credit when an employee spends more than 20% of their hours on non-tip-producing activities. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:28 pm
Please contact a member of our Employee Benefits Practice Group for more information. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 12:40 pm
Please contact your Foley & Lardner Labor and Employment attorney with questions. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 8:31 am
Prior History of NLRB Election Rules When a union files a petition to represent a group of employees, the Board requires specific action from both the employer and the union prior to proceeding to an election, and may hold hearings to resolved disputed legal issues prior to the commencement of an election. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 2:02 am
Employee resource groups (ERGs) are also an effective way to help employees feel they can be authentic and heard at work. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:26 am
In Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, the NLRB significantly altered the process for how a labor union becomes certified as the exclusive bargaining representative of a group of employees. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically requested… [read post]
