Search for: "Ex Parte Scott"
Results 741 - 760
of 960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
How Manchin Used Politics to Protect His Family Coal Company Yahoo News – Scott Waldman (Politico) | Published: 2/8/2022 As West Virginia’s governor, Joe Manchin supported a provision in a clean energy bill that was moving through the state Legislature in 2009. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Scott, 296 P.3d 273, 275 (Colo. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
It represents a preemptive surrender on America’s experiment with facilities-based competition and the beginning what Scott Cleland has correctly labeled a “de-competition policy. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 7:18 am
Also put up a slide graphic of Scott Shreeve's definition of Health 2.0 a much broader definition. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
”[9] Although the piece was labeled “editorial,” the journal provided no disclaimer that Wasserstein was not speaking ex cathedra. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Case 8:08-cv-02212-SDM-MAP Document 12 Filed 11/19/2008 Page 1 of 17IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDATAMPA DIVISIONWAYNE TOMPKINS,Petitioner,v.CASE NO. 8:08-cv-2212-T-23MAPWALTER A. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The ASEA submitted its certification to the comptroller, along with a letter from its counsel, stating, in part, that the organization submitted the certification "under protest and without waiving any of its rights as they relate to any ongoing litigation concerning [the Act], or related to the rules and regulations promulgated in your 'Memorandum to Affected Organizations.'" The AEA declined to submit a certification form and thus was deemed ineligible to … [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Scott Perry. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Citibank, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, which also sits in Houston and lords over the same trial courts in ten surrounding counties, did not merely hold that use of credit card and payments to account demonstrated existence of contract (thus ruling against the Defendant on that issue), but also reversed the judgment in part because the bank had not adduced any evidence of what the variable interest rate was at the relevant time (thereby sustaining one of the Defendant’s complaints… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:12 am
Although there were differences between them, these played no part in her conclusions on liability overall. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:01 pm
Still, a few teachers, journalists and politicians who make the trip each year get friendlier treatment, as part of the NSF's outreach efforts. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The case has drawn interest in Washington in part because of the prominence of the three main figures, each of whom has played high-profile roles in politics and lobbying. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:48 am
Scott v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:11 am
Here is an excerpt from Hayden ex rel. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
KG v Derek Scott (PatLit) (Class 99) (IPKat) April 2010 trial ordered in trade mark infringement and copycat advertising dispute between Specsavers and Asda (IPKat) ‘Give it back! [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
KG v Derek Scott (PatLit) (Class 99) (IPKat) April 2010 trial ordered in trade mark infringement and copycat advertising dispute between Specsavers and Asda (IPKat) ‘Give it back! [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
In a later post Roy Greenslade returns to the question of whether Ms Perroncel has consistently denied the affair, concluding that “the Grazia interview, conducted in mid-May, is part of a consistent patten of denials”. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
State Farm, Karmeier cast the deciding vote to reverse a $1 billion judgment against State Farm for its use of aftermarket car parts in repairs. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
Elstad by holding that the deliberate, planned refusal to warn, followed by warnings after confession should be treated the same as the momentary, innocent failure to warn in Elstad; and 3) the Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling that defendant’s confession was voluntary resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of facts presented in the state court proceeding, because the “admonition” that defendant should “cut a deal” was not simply… [read post]
