Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 741 - 760
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 6:31 am
Plaintiff moved for fees and costs of slightly more than $10,000.00, claiming the litigation required four lawyers, three paralegals and an “IT Specialist” who together billed 32.2 hours. 7 The opinion is available here. 1 Zavodnick v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 12:38 pm
Titled “Retreat from the High Water Mark: Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims Involving Excessive Fees After Tibble v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
The Ninth Circuit recently injected some much-needed reason into the objection process with its ruling in Glasser v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 1:16 am
LoveReal Time Data, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:16 pm
§ 941 in the case of Wayman Fire Protection, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:50 am
Casamento v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
McKeage v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 7:08 am
A class action suit currently underway just survived a motion to dismiss a challenge to such fees in a ruling from the Appellate Division, Second Department last week in Lonner v Simon Prop. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 3:54 pm
We’ve finally gotten an order entered certifying a class action in Martin v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
See Horenstein v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:27 pm
The desultory argument in Rimini Street v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:32 am
In Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
Redman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
In Sutton v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:58 pm
Nokia Fee Order WPEM LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:28 am
Tillich v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 11:07 am
Green v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Along those lines, the rule is likely to implicate “vast economic and political significance,” which could in turn raise constitutional questions under the Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
In and unpublished case entitled Fernandez v. [read post]
