Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 741 - 760
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Ex parte injunction granted: Street Surfing LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:50 am
Defendant, therefore, failed to carry his burden to establish an identity of issues between the two actions and is not entitled to invoke the doctrine of collateral estoppel (see Cary v Fisher, 149 AD2d 890, 891 [1989]). [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:15 am
Supreme Court's decision last year in District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:18 am
Damn....In other news, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
Fisher, 2009 WL 2462563 (Pa. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 4:07 pm
The district court agreed. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:27 pm
Fisher in Perry v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:19 pm
Fisher and Marsha S. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:35 am
Supreme Court, December 07, 2009 Michigan v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:49 am
Like the decision yesterday in Michigan v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
The Court has granted certiorari in two cases, Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
Fisher-Price, Inc., 485 F.3d 1157, 1161 (Fed. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:30 am
Fisher and Marsha S. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:34 am
Two cases pending before the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, however, demonstrate the need for Congress to act to provide a third exception. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:01 am
The district court acknowledged it had the authority to depart, but declined to do so, and sentenced the defendant to 188 months. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
Relying on a recent and directly on point case out of the New Jersey Supreme Court, Rowe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
According to me as well as everyone who actually matters; e.g., Judges Fisher, Gould and England [the latter sitting by designation from the Eastern District of California].) [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
The district court found that the patent was not anticipated or obvious but was invalid on the grounds that it was not enabled. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court pointed this out in 2008 in Regalado Cuellar v. [read post]
