Search for: "Fisher v. Major" Results 741 - 760 of 802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2008, 10:42 pm
I hope Fisher Meredith can take this one to the Lords. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
  This issue took on importance because of Justice Fisher's finding that, under the terms of the operating agreement, the LLC was managed by the President absent a superseding directive by a majority of the members. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:22 pm
And the six judges on the majority, who found that there was both a violation and no qualified immunity, admittedly consisted of a Carter appointee (Judge Pregerson) and three Clinton appointees (Judges Wardlaw, Fisher, and Paez), but it was the swing votes of two of the most recent Bush II appointees -- the Judges Smith -- that made the difference.Yes, draws matter. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
The three major routes of contamination of raw milk include:i. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
Not surprisingly, yesterday’s decision in DC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
Fisher (Duke, Michigan Law) lost Exxon v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:14 pm
Personally-- and I admit my own prejudice here -- I think that Judge Fisher makes a darn good point in the majority opinion that since the relevant U.S. [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:03 pm
Chalk this up towards evening the score, I guess.Judge Tallman writes the majority opinion, Chief Judge Kozinski concurs, and Judge Fisher dissents. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 7:53 am
As Doug Berman notes, the coverage of Kennedy v. [read post]