Search for: "Florida v. United States"
Results 741 - 760
of 6,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 12:22 pm
Florida (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act - Good Faith Negotiations)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html White v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:16 pm
That's what the Florida Supreme Court created in Olmstead v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:29 am
Barker Boatworks, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, No. 17-11176, 07 August 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:41 pm
United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:49 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
Eventually, Respondent provided a phone number and stated that she was living in Tampa, Florida, with her uncle.Respondent would not provide Petitioner with the address of her residence in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:57 pm
The Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:55 am
(United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, December 7, 2011) The issue in this environmental coverage dispute was whether a 2011 amendment to the Florida statutory scheme governing sinkhole insurance which added a statutory definition of "structural damage" should be applied retroactively to the insurance policy. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:03 am
Case date: 27 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-14374 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
Unfortunately, slip and fall accidents happen routinely in Florida and throughout the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 2:21 am
In Wesley v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:23 am
” In United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Koontz (SC09-713), the Florida Supreme Court applied the United States Supreme Court's case law interpreting the takings clause of the United States Constitution and held: Accordingly, we hold that under the takings clauses of the United States and Florida Constitutions, the Nollan/Dolan rule with regard to “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” is applicable only where the… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:15 am
That’s the law here in the State of Florida. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:27 am
It is therefore crucial that they review the recent decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Downs v. [read post]
7 May 2006, 9:37 am
In a recent case, two homeowners immigrated from Switzerland and resided legally in the United States. [read post]
