Search for: "General RE Services Corp." Results 741 - 760 of 2,527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm by MOTP
Standard of Review Whether parties have agreed to arbitrate is a gateway matter ordinarily committed to the trial court[11] and controlled by state law governing "the validity, revocability, and enforceability of contracts generally. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:42 am by Victoria Clark
Interested candidates should send a resume, transcript, and cover letter to Sarvenaz Bakhtiar, Director of Operations of the Center on Law and Security (cls@mercury.law.nyu.edu) with “Program Associate Application” in the subject line or submit materials through the career services portal by June 15, 2018. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 10:10 am by Austin B. Calhoun, Esq.
Straub Capital Corp., 682 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (final furnishing of mantel occurred when modified mantel was re-delivered after mantel initially tendered was rejected as non-confirming to contract for materials; contract could not be considered complete until satisfactory product delivered) ; compare Cross State Dev. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:14 am by Victoria Clark
Former members of the Peace Corps may be considered for ODNI employment only if five full years have elapsed since separation from the Peace Corps. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 11:22 pm by Bernie Burk
  If you’re curious, David McGowan and I have tried to catalogue the theories offered and how well they fit the facts here at pages 41-64.) [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:20 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Interested candidates should send a resume, transcript, and cover letter to Sarvenaz Bakhtiar, Director of Operations of the Center on Law and Security (cls@mercury.law.nyu.edu) with “Program Associate Application” in the subject line or submit materials through the career services portal by June 15, 2018. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:00 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Former members of the Peace Corps may be considered for ODNI employment only if five full years have elapsed since separation from the Peace Corps. [read post]
24 May 2018, 6:59 am by rachel@masslomap.org
Example: If you’re a lawyer and own a law practice (S Corp, Schedule C, LLP or LLC) and have $100,000 of profit (QBI), then you only pay federal tax on $80,000. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:51 am by Dennis Crouch
  See, Dennis Crouch, The US Venue Laws Do Not Protect Alien Defendants, Patently-O (May 9, 2018); In re HTC Corp., 2018 U.S. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm by MOTP
In issues two through four, Doggett argues that The Travis Law Firm cannot recover attorney’s fees from a prior lawsuit as actual damages because (1) the Texas Supreme Court has not adopted an equitable exception to the general rule regarding attorney’s fees; (2) an attorney representing himself does not incur attorney’s fees; and (3) The Travis Law Firm was not a prevailing party in the prior lawsuit. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
  When the stormtrooper’s come, the legal strategy says: “These droids aren’t the ones you’re looking for. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Supreme Court held that an auto dealership’s service advisors are exempt under FLSA, Section 213(b)(10)(A), which applies to “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles, trucks, or farm implements. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 11:32 am by Joel A. Webber
The bold collaboration I described in Part I of this series among Univar’s General Counsel Jeffrey Carr, the law firm ElevateNext, and law company Elevate Services is just the latest chapter in legal innovation for each of them. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am by MOTP
DoorDash is a California company that provides food-delivery service by using independent contractors it calls Dashers. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:32 am by William Ford
Former members of the Peace Corps may be considered for ODNI employment only if five full years have elapsed since separation from the Peace Corps. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Reform Act’s provisions apply to federal court class actions brought under the 1933 Act and 1934 Act.[14] Under the Reform Act, lead plaintiffs asserting 1933 Act or 1934 Act claims on behalf of a class are no longer selected based on who wins the “race to the courthouse” – instead, courts must engage in a process to determine which purported class member is “most capable of adequately representing the interests of class members” as the lead plaintiff.[15]… [read post]