Search for: "Graves v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 9:31 am
v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:05 pm
The State Bar of California may not yet be aware of Mitts’s behavior. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:36 pm
Carefully consider the grave obligation of the state for the welfare of children who lack legal parents and need permanent placements, taking into account the number of such children who must be placed each year and the difficulties of finding suitable placements, especially for older children. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 3:17 am
Case Name: Retz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:38 am
In the leading Insular case, Downes v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:01 am
iStock_000003589389Medium.jpg While noting general agreement that FRE 606(b) precludes inquiry into the validity of a verdict based on a juror’s testimony about racial or ethnic comments made “during the course of deliberations,†First Circuit finds the rule “cannot be applied so inflexibly as to bar juror testimony in those rare and grave cases where claims of racial or ethnic bias during jury deliberations implicate a… [read post]
18 Jan 2025, 7:10 am
The recent appellate decision State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
In Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor [2014] UKSC 68, the Supreme Court considered the ambit of the right under s 4. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Borough of Jim Thorpe (Native American Graves and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA))City of Duluth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 6:25 pm
Department of Education v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:20 am
Thus, the arbitrator’s decision could not have been based on the parties’ contractual intent.In sum, the Court stated, “convincing a court of an arbitrator's error – even his grave error – is not enough. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:51 am
” In 1984, in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Justice Kitchens dissented and was joined by Justice Graves. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
Of grave concern was the stationary major source permitting provisions (PSD and Title V programs) which were triggered anytime a source emitted 250 tons or, in case of Title V, 100 tons of a pollutant. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 8:48 am
See, e.g., Lynch v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 12:00 pm
In this context, the concern about preempting public use of certain kinds of knowledge, emphasized in Mayo, is a grave one. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
Attorneys and state attorneys general. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:45 am
Eliza “Lyda” Burton-“One hundred thousand dollars would be no inducement whatever in buying my consent to the desecration of the graves of my parents. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Specifically, Syed argued that the State failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence (a fax cover sheet disclaiming the reliability of the cell phone records), which violated the State’s duty imposed by Brady v. [read post]
