Search for: "Graves v. United States"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 9:34 am
Although family mobility has been global for decades, the United States Supreme Court, for the first time,[1] has interpreted a provision of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, a treaty to which the United States is a contracting state. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Sackett v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:31 pm
In Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am
In a mundane lens, this is a somewhat unsurprising application of the notoriously conservative Article 42.5 test refined in the “PKU” case, North Western Health Board v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:51 am
Nevertheless, the lower federal courts in the United States have repeatedly held that financial hardship on the part of the plaintiff is not enough to make an otherwise valid forum selection clause unenforceable. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:27 pm
Medellin’s execution could have grave consequences for Americans abroad. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
United States, the justices will decide if Idaho’s Defense of Life Act is “pre-empted,” or blocked, because it conflicts with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am
Cal.) in Weiss v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am
We reject that result because the United States Constitution cannot properly be so interpreted. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 2:49 pm
This is a grave violation of religious freedom and cannot stand. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am
At Cato@Liberty, Trevor Burrus predicts that the Court will summarily reverse the Montana Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the state’s ban on independent expenditures by corporations – a ruling that Burrus calls an attempt to “nullify” Citizens United. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:55 pm
Sosa v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 pm
The letter read in part: "Because you were a witness in the case of the People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:46 am
United States, this Court held that part of a federal law's definition of "violent felony" was impermissibly vague. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Germany, the U.K., and the United States notably belong to the latter camp. [read post]
