Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 741 - 760 of 2,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 9:26 am by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
Final Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule On May 13, 2010, EPA set greenhouse gas emissions thresholds to define when permits under the New Source Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Operating Permit programs are required for new and existing industrial facilities. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:43 pm
EPA, which required the agency to act under the Clean Air Act to treat greenhouse gasses as pollutants. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Dianne Saxe
Yes, according to the Endangerment Opinion of the District of Columbia US Court of Appeals: “Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:47 pm
Yesterday, Robert Barnes hosted a discussion of the Court's decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:08 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse points out what appears to be a factual error in the Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am by Amy Howe
” At Bloomberg View, Ramesh Ponnuru responds to Linda Greenhouse’s column (featured in Thursday’s round-up) on polarization and the Court, arguing that Greenhouse “accidentally proves conservatives right. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 10:18 am
Steven Greenhouse, "Tough times for American workers," San Francisco Chronicle (Apr. 18, 2008). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 11:37 am by William A. Ruskin
Court of Appeals decision, dated June 26, 2012, in Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:24 pm by Joe Koncelik
Title V permits-  a program originally designed to make air permitting more easily understood, has led to permits that are hundreds of pages long. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by Allison Smith
Anticipating criticism of its about-face in the legal arguments underpinning the CPP, the proposed rule notes judicial precedent, including Chevron v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by Allison Smith
Anticipating criticism of its about-face in the legal arguments underpinning the CPP, the proposed rule notes judicial precedent, including Chevron v. [read post]