Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:51 pm
The first of the pair, Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am
SnapRays, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:43 pm
The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit, Hutchinson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
The true scope of the elusive but all pervasive party autonomy doctrine was at the heart of the debate in the case of Rock Advertising Limited v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:18 am
Hale, The Law of Damages, § 67 (2d ed. 1912). [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
Here’s a nice personal jurisdiction decision (TV Azteca v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 10:58 am
For a recent example, check out McNeil v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
In Maples v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
In that case, it was clearly stated by Hale J that where: "An asset which was taken into account and correctly valued at the date of the hearing changes value within a relatively short time owing to natural processes of price fluctuation" ... [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:41 am
Board of Education.In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:42 pm
Texas, the 2003 case that overturned state sodomy laws, but perhaps they'll submit a question in writingMore on Roper v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:27 am
In Hale v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
5) Major questions of public policy in America in 2024 should not be resolved by the values of ancient worlds (Mathew Hale, really?). [read post]
