Search for: "HOLDING v. STATE"
Results 741 - 760
of 69,976
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2024, 9:54 am
For example, the prohibition against using/holding/supporting an electronic wireless communications device does not apply to: Driving a public safety vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device in the course of the person’s duties Storing the device in a holster, harness, or article of clothing Holding the device near one’s ear for a call without manually entering numbers/letters/symbols Using speaker phone without holding or… [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 8:45 am
The case is Trump v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:40 am
IrelandTallon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 5:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:19 pm
In Ohio v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:04 pm
Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:44 am
In SEC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:43 am
And as in Janus v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:06 am
In Trump v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:06 am
In Trump v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:30 am
United States is more satisfying than the majority on several counts. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:46 am
The case of Hudson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
” One response was to give Congress concrete new powers to enforce the amendments, borrowing the “appropriate” language from Chief Justice Marshall’s epochal opinion in McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:15 am
State Bd. of Equalization, 19 Cal. 4th 1, 7 (1998). [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 6:03 pm
Martell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
After discussing what Murthy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:51 am
Raimondo) Put on hold the Environmental Protection Agency’s “good neighbor” plan to minimize air pollution that crosses state lines (Ohio v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:05 am
United States and Duffey v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 4:36 am
Several national decisions, as well as the UPC CoA decision in Nanostring v 10x Genomics were cited. [read post]
