Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL v. US " Results 741 - 760 of 1,676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 10:03 am by Lara
”  If only poor punctuation were grounds for refusal, the Yankees would have a home run here. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
Penalties range from fines of 7,000-11,000 euro to the seizure and destruction of counterfeit goods, equipment and materials used for their production. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 1:29 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Herb Lin discussed why examining the source code of an anti-virus product like Kaspersky would not necessarily rule out the possibility to product could be used for an attack. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
  "Sterile," "ungodly boring," "it works but the same way the German war production worked. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:52 am by Roger Alford
The Kyoto accords had their counterpart in the federal government’s efforts to control the production of every bushel of wheat on every American farm in Wickard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
 Companies that may have contributed to Russian or insurgent tech or to the development of materials used in the invasion--from chemical weapons, to trucks and tires, to the clothing used to uniform personal may all face complicity responsibilities. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 12:10 pm
The jiplp weblog carries a pre-publication chance to read the Current Intelligence notes of Joel Smith and Joanna Silver (Herbert Smith LLP) on L'Oréal SA v eBay International and of fellow Kat Matt Fisher (UCL) on Albert Packaging v Nampak. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am by Katitza Rodriguez
The categories “traffic data,” “subscriber information,” and “content data” apply to communications surveillance, but these categories are not used—and no such distinctions are drawn—in the context of the preservation, production, and search and seizure powers. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:44 pm
International Game Technology, 521 F.3d 1328 (Fed Cir. 2008), and Blackboard, Inc. v. [read post]