Search for: "Havens v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 3,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2023, 12:00 pm by David Oscar Markus
United States, where Justice Jackson was the only member of the Court to join Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion in full; and Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:30 am by Richard Goldfarb
It took our intrepid docket clerk a few weeks of digging, and finally contacting the plaintiffs' counsel directly, to get a copy of the complaint in Delio v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:03 am by Jeff Gamso
  In fact, the Supreme Court held, in Mills v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
Welcome back to the human rights roundup, a regular bulletin of all the law we haven’t quite managed to feature in full blog posts. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
The Los Angeles Times has this story about a pending California Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:54 am
But what defendants haven't had is the proof that these machines -- which are used by every agency in the state -- are actually working. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
DeStefano (07-1428) and Ricci v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am by Eric Goldman
Substantial State Interest As usual, the court credits the state’s interest in protecting children’s privacy and physical/psychological well-being. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:35 pm
This isn't the first time MySpace has been sued on this front; last year, MySpace was sued in Texas state court for the same issue in Doe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 6:33 am
That lost and we haven't had very much success with it ourselves in the last decade.No, what was interesting to us was the argument that the case presented "substantial federal issues" within the meaning of Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456 (20 April 2011)  Court of appeal sends Zimbabwean asylum case back to tribunal as need more evidence as to whether they would have to lie about political beliefs. [read post]