Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 741 - 760
of 4,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
The United States needs a constitutional amendment. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 7:42 am
"There is hardly any political question in the United States that sooner or later does not turn into a judicial question," observed Alexis de Tocqueville in 1835. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
” Scene 2: The proclamation creates exceptions to the entry bans based on the national interests of the United States (among other grounds). [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
” Scene 2: The proclamation creates exceptions to the entry bans based on the national interests of the United States (among other grounds). [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:13 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Holder and Abbott v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:57 pm
A recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in Romag Fasteners, Inc v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm
The Court affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s finding that the lawsuits against Amazon and its customers—Patreon, Vox Media, Dictionary.com, Vice Media, Oath, Inc., Buzzfeed, Popsugar and Ziff Davis—were barred in part by a 1907 Supreme Court ruling, Kessler v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:36 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
July 29, 2019: Capital One issues a public announcement concerning the data breach, which affected approximately 100 million individuals in the United States and approximately 6 million in Canada. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:50 am
Those of us following the Nokia v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:00 am
The so-called SSPPU (Smallest Saleable Patent Practicing Unit) method is also discussed: this is a method for calculating royalties that is based on the smallest unit – module, unit or component – that employs the patented technology. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm
United States, 3 CIT 219 (1982). [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Holder v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005) and United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:08 pm
Timm, both United States Supreme Court cases. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
Longstanding practice indicates that a federal law's creation of an office in this context does not automatically make its holder an "Officer of the United States. [read post]