Search for: "Hughes v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Frank Adams v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 8:23 am
As a consequence scholars knew very little about the Court’s internal deliberations in the landmark cases of its 1936 October Term.This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v… [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Speed v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 1:20 pm
Last, but not least, Hugh Stephens reports on his blog (Hugh Stephens Blog) how harmful are the Remote Access Trojans (RATs), which are sometimes embedded in websites offering pirated goods. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
In 2009, in Minnesota v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am
United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
United States" is now up on SSRN. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
In the case of Hughes v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 12:56 am
State of Uttar Pradesh ([1964] 1 SCR 332). [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Casey and Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
Hughes, 497 S.W.3d 400, 403 (Mo. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
The court concluded that giving parents the right to participate as parties (and be represented by counsel) directly undermined the Supreme Court’s holding in Bellotti v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:31 pm
Visual Memory v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:43 am
Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
The UK Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative earlier this week in its judgment in R v M & Ors [2017] UKSC 58.Issued in the context of an interlocutory appeal in criminal proceedings, this ruling concerned the proper construction of section 92(1) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Hughes states that the acid test should be whether the application is in substance (impermissibly) to vary or alter the final order or whether it is (permissibly) to support it by working out how it should be carried into effect [54]. [read post]
