Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 741 - 760
of 950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm
This is Part 3 of a three-part series which originally appeared on Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
For those who want an insight into this new law on the right to privacy, Hugh Tomlinson QC’s three posts which we have reposted from Inforrm’s Blog provide a great outline, an interesting historical background to the law as it stands and a discussion of options for the future. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am
The 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square website has a piece about the recent privacy cases of Richard Spearman QC – the Tweedledum of the injunction circuit according to the “Independent” (with Inforrm committee member Hugh Tomlinson QC being the “Tweedledee”). [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am
This is Part 2 of a three part series which originally appeared on Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:52 pm
In our contribution to the continuing debate on this issue we are re-posting this two-part discussion on the history and future of privacy law from Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
As expected by Inforrm this does not concern the UK at all but, rather, a (default) judgment in a defamation claim brought in Canada against a Missouri resident. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
discussion on the history and future of privacy law from Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
As reported in a recent post Inforrm has researched all the “anonymised” hearings in the Queen’s Bench Division in the first quarter of 2011 – there were eleven hearings, seven of which have produced published public judgments. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
The Prime Minister has said that he is “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB - Read judgment The case of OPQ v BJM addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm
Mark Thomson is a partner at Atkins Thomson and a member of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 2:01 am
Inforrm’s Blog: The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:19 pm
The campaign’s critics, notably the Inforrm blog, say they have the focus wrong. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
This informed piece by INFORRM – is a good one to read…. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:41 am
The campaign’s detractors, notably the Inforrm blog, say they have the focus wrong. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm
However, as The Lawyer notes, the UK judiciary and parliament’s relationship is at the very least becoming more fraught and the Inforrm blog, shedding some light on the number and types of privacy injunctions currently before the High Court, reminds us of the UK judiciary’s continued difficult relationship with the media. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:29 pm
As previously reported on Inforrm, three News of the World journalists have been arrested in 2011 – Ian Edmondson, Neville Thurlbeck and James Weatherup – in connection with the police’s ongoing investigation into the interception of voicemail messages. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
It marked Part II of the British phone hacking saga and re-opened an enormous can of worms in Wapping (Part I, as readers of Inforrm will be aware, had seen private investigator Glenn Mulcaire and journalist Clive Goodman jailed for illegally intercepting voicemail messages). [read post]
