Search for: "Idaho v. United States" Results 741 - 760 of 874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 11:02 am by Brian E. Barreira
” (emphasis added) As was recently explained by the United States District Court for the District of Idaho in the case of K.W. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:02 am by Brian E. Barreira
” (emphasis added) As was recently explained by the United States District Court for the District of Idaho in the case of K.W. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
For more information, see United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
For more information, see United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
For more information, see United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:14 am by Lyle Denniston
McQuigg is now the fifth to reach the Court on the controversy after a wave of lower court rulings — striking down state bans in almost all of the cases so far — that had followed the Supreme Court’s decision fourteen months ago in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:19 pm by Amy Howe
United States, the justices narrowed the scope of a federal criminal statute under which hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants – including Trump – were charged. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm by John Ross
United States (1935), which until recently limited this sort of thing. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
United States, 649 A.2d 301, 308 (D.C. 1994) ("a patient waives the privilege as to relevant evidence by filing a lawsuit which places in issue the patient's medical condition"); Carson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am by Kiran Bhat
United States, by a vote of six to three, the Court held that a federal district court has the discretion to order a federal criminal sentence to run after a state criminal sentence that is anticipated but has not yet been imposed. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
 In re Fresh and Process Potatoes Antitrust Litigation, United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Case No. 4:10-MD-2186-BLW. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am by Ad Law Defense
  It did so on the basis of its allegation that the listing mechanism violated the California and United States Constitutions. [read post]