Search for: "In Interest of Ep" Results 741 - 760 of 1,023
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/PZninMX1D5 -> National Photo Group Brings Copyright Suit to Protect Interests in Photos http://t.co/lt2wscvHKd -> EU: Right to be forgotten now the right to erasure | Privacy This Week http://t.co/JNJ56fjQnY -> Cyber criminals cost India $4 billion in 2013: Symantec http://t.co/mQqQBIQtQi -> Bill C-56 in Parliament http://t.co/ph7EEFS082 -> Pirate Bay cofounder appeals hacking case, argues to halt his extradition http://t.co/N6gpOAa9Fl -> Five Essential Music… [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
“According to the established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal a party is only considered to be adversely affected by a decision if the decision does not accede to its requests (Benkard, EPÜ, EPÜ, Munich 2002, Article 107, Note 13 and the decisions cited therein, Case Law, 4th edition 2001, VII. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”The reference number for the case (K 1959 EP) was the same as that which had been used in the opposition proceedings.[1.3] The fact that the address of the appellant was not stated in the notice of appeal (cf. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm by Patent Docs
The seminar will consist of the following sessions: • Introduction to the European Patent Convention • EP Case Law of InterestEP Claim Drafting Specialties • Opposition • Unitary Patent • Moderated Panel Discussion: EPC (UPP) vs. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
The consolidated proceeding [before the Federal Patent Court] now has case no. 1 Ni 3/13 (EP) (cf. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:20 am by Florian Mueller
It's not advisable to assume that editorial decision-makers never care about the interests of the major advertisers who fund them. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Insofar as the European patent has not yet been granted (R 16(1)(b)) this third party may, no later than three months after the decision recognising its entitlement has become final (R 16(1)(a)), in respect of Contacting States designated in the EP application in which the decision has been taken or recognised or must be recognised on the basis of the Protocol on Recognition:(a) prosecute the EP application as its own application in place of the applicant (A 61(1)(a));(b) file a… [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:35 am by Claudio Fabiani
Any Parliament interested can go to the repository and download the code. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:20 am
  Although it would be interesting to see the effect LexisNexis had on these numbers, it wasn't available at this time. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
 With a formal partnership, you will never have to scramble to do high-volume work when you suddenly wake up one day and realize it’s in your interest! [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
Merpel meantime has been scampering around the corridors of the EPO, and heard that the patent in suit (EP 1 994 937) was revoked by the Opposition Division at Oral Proceedings on 10 June 2013 on the grounds of sufficiency (Main Request) and added matter (Auxiliary Requests). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
 Someone has to calculate revenue and expenses to determine profitability and most attorneys aren't capable or interested in economics. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
 Another Katfriend, the excellent Claire Lazenby, read with interest Monday's Katpost on a sudden apparent change for the worst in terms of the availability of information on the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) website ("Security interests in trade marks: has something gone awry?" [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
Among the Hitachi patents, two standard-essential patents are particularly important : EP 0957 594 describes the synchronisation of handset and network in the UMTS standard. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 2:32 am
The background to this case was that AGA Medical had the European patent EP 0 808 138, directed to an intravascular occlusion device and a method for manufacturing the same. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:03 am
 Lastly, there is much more interest in new technologies. [read post]
11 May 2013, 5:29 pm
Quite to the contrary, this prerogative of the licensee is in the public interests. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:44 am by Florian Mueller
To date, of the 24 infringement actions that Nokia has brought against HTC in Germany, two (EP 1329982 and EP 1474750) have been stayed because of concerns over validity, and three (EP 0812120, EP 1312974 and EP1581016) have now been dismissed outright. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 4:01 am
The IPKat found the "good" examples to be less illuminating than the "bad" ones, because the really interesting stuff is going to be found somewhere in between the extremes cited by Google to make its point. [read post]