Search for: "In Re: v. In Re:"
Results 741 - 760
of 62,871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2024, 4:07 pm
But even where the Ninth Circuit panel in this particular case -- Judges Callahan, Nguyen and Bress -- so inclined (and they're not), the stark facts of the underlying crimes would make it very surprising were this case to have come out any different than it did.Which, by definition, it didn't.It's a death penalty case from Arizona, and even though it's taken 32 years (!) [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm
“We’re all going to be getting our feet wet. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:36 pm
The court highlighted the distinction between traditional and modern attachments in the 2021 case, Nichols v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
25, citing Reference re Public Schools Act (Man.), s. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am
— Dylan Gibbswith Michel HajjarTODAY'S DOCKETSetting the shrouded record straightJailing a lawyer for contemptSuing clients for bad reviewsHong Kong retirements, vaccinated juries, and restrictive covenantsCOURT ACCESSSCC clears up secret trials in-camera proceedingsCBC v Named Person, 2024 SCC 21If you expected the Supreme Court to rally against Quebec's "secret trial", Friday's decision probably came as a surprise. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
In this toxic tort action, the Colorado Supreme Court in In Re Jordan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
It arises in a criminal case where the defendant was accused of making threats relating to his employment with the Post Office.The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:20 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm
(quoting In re Estate of Bonham, 817 A.2d 192, 195 (D.C. 2003)). [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm
Lancaster, 385 N.C. 459 (2023), and In re J.U., 384 N.C. 618 (2023), as noted here. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:41 am
Case Citation: Griner v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:31 am
Jackson Int’l Trading, 2012 TTAB LEXIS 246, at *6; Hornby v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONC. v City of New York [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:47 am
One of my favorites was seeing Justice Ginsburg preside over a re-enactment of Muller v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 10:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:48 am
Here are materials in Yakama Nation v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:42 am
In Kauders v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:39 am
Zesty Paws LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
(Citing In re D.P. (2023) 14 Cal.5th 266, 276.) [read post]