Search for: "In Re Hogan"
Results 741 - 749
of 749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2024, 5:14 am
Finally, we’re pleased to announce ComplexDiscovery OÜ’s new partnership with EDRM. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 11:47 am
See Steve Burns, “$28 Billion Day Trader that Even Warren Buffett Acknowledges,” Moneyshow, July 8, 2022 (quoting Simons, “we’re 100% right 50.75 percent of the time”). [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal America’s Governors Get Tested for a Virus That Is Testing Them New York Times – Manny Fernandez, Rick Rojas, Shawn Huber, and Mike Baker | Published: 7/13/2020 Governors have always been judged on their disaster responses, but the coronavirus wreaking havoc across the country these days does not recede like floodwaters and cannot be tamed by calling out the National Guard. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa [Eric’s note: Prof. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
The court in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 (18 June 2014), questioned whether the Directive and the EU Commissioner’s Decision needed to be re-evaluated in the light of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and whether the Commissioner could look beyond or otherwise disregard the Community finding. [read post]
