Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 741 - 760
of 29,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 5:26 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.January 7, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Peak Financial Partners, Inc., Serial No. 85414941 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark PEAK & Design, shown below, for certain financial and real estate services, in view of the registered marks PEAK FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, INC. for certain financial services; PEAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT for certain real estate services; PEAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT &… [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 1:37 pm
But Samuel Clemens can't claim to be Mark Twain in my business dealings with him (if it matters to me that he is in fact Mark Twain). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:52 pm
Mark & Greg compare Elephants We're not all about BigLaw pricing, and Vendor bashing here at 3 Geeks. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:30 am
Mark Levine for State Senate Dear Friend,Thanks to the grassroots support of people like you, our campaign continues to shock the political establishment. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 11:00 am
Following a defense verdict in the insider trading case brought against him by the SEC, Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban has not been sitting on the bench—but rather using his blog to stay on the offensive. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
In re Sajen, Inc., Serial No. 77257189 (June 4, 2009) [not precedential].Remember that when the goods/services are identical or closely related, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is necessary to support a determination that confusion is likely. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:31 am
Re Under 40s Group's next event - What Aftershocks Will the (Re)Insurance Industry See from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:23 am
" The Court was not convinced:Although either the re-examination or a change to the false patent marking statute promises to simplify the issues, neither the re-examination, nor the legislative effort to modify the false patent marking statute, nor the constitutional challenge before the Federal Circuit demonstrably will conclude before this litigation. [read post]
27 Sep 2006, 12:43 am
In re Homeland Vinyl Prods. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey, Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law Federal Circuit holds refusal to register a political message for T-shirts violates the First Amendment, but fails to acknowledge that these types of registrations can chill expression On February 24, 2022, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held in the case In re Elster that Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act was an unconstitutional regulation of expression as applied to an applicant who attempted to… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:26 pm
Some days you're the windshield.Some days you're the bug.Hit it, Mark.Dire Straits said it best in "The Bug" - one of the better cuts from my favorite album from law school days. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:22 am
"Imeldawritten by Mark KnopflerThe heirs of the late president Ferdinand Marcos are taking steps to regain assets seized during a military revolt that toppled his 20-year reign. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:52 am
Marks Differ in Meaning and Commercial Impression Next, the Board considered the similarity of the marks: ALLEGIANCE STAFFING and ALLEGIS. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:38 am
You’re back here today at home, if I may say. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:44 am
MARK STEYN: He Said / VIP Said. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 6:51 am
In In Re BP Lubricants USA Inc., No. 960, 2011 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:12 pm
Author User:Makaristos Licence Public Domain Jane LambertBusiness and Property Courts of England and Wales (Mr Ian Karet) Marriott Worldwide Corporation v Delta Air Lines, Inc. [2023] EWHC 283 (Ch) (10 Feb 2023In Re DELTA, Delta Air Lines, Inc, v Marriott Worldwide Corporation O/081/22 31 Jan 2022, Marriutt Worldwide Corporation ("Marriott") successfully resisted an application by Delta Air [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:16 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Nikon Corporation, Serial No. 86828751 ((October 6, 2017) [not precedential] [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark MMD (in standard characters) for “laser scanners for industrial inspection and for geometrical measurement, and not for use with land surveying equipment; software for collection and interpretation of data in the operation of laser scanners, not for use with land surveying equipment,” in view of the registered… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:49 am
[Refusal to register the mark shown below left for "tax filing services," in view of the registered mark TRS in standard character and design form (below right) for tax advisory services.In re Mannatech, Inc., Serial No. 86447383 (August 17, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
July 7, 2022 - 1 PM: In re Di-Namic Records, Serial No. 87399929 [Refusal to register the mark THIS IS FOR MY GIRLS for "entertainment information; musical composition for others; production of musical sound recording," on the ground that the specimens of use do not evidence an association between the mark and the recited services.] [read post]
