Search for: "Irons v. Irons"
Results 741 - 760
of 4,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2009, 11:35 am
" The theory being that if you're stripping a car, you're likely to be armed.Ultimately Justice Sepulveda adds a couple of other (incredibly minor) factors here that arguably assist in establishing the fact that the defendant might be armed -- including, ironically enough, the fact that Osborne was a large 240 pounds (though to me that proves that he was less likely to need and carry a weapon) -- to hold that the "totality" of the circumstances suggested that he was… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
Since -- and this seems ironic to me, given the usual differences between the two states -- California law is allegedly more restrictive about who counts as a "parent" in this context than Arizona.So particularly if you're interested in who counts as a daddy in our Great State, this is definitely an opinion worth reading. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:31 pm
So, seriously, it'd receive a D if one of my students wrote it as an exam answer.Which is somewhat ironic. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:19 am
By, ironically enough, seven votes. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 12:08 pm
I'd have written a slightly different opinion than my former boss (including, ironically enough, that I wouldn't have been nearly as defensive as he was, though I imagine that some of that was probably just for Judge Wardlaw's comfort). [read post]
11 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The Ninth Circuit said no, in Dariano v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
" I remember that in the Plowshares v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:15 am
Even if this never happened, ironic though that might be, the notion is sound. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
A copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Hersch v DeWitt Stern Group, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:05 pm
Co. of Philadelphia v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:48 am
Malibu Media, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:06 am
How ironic that a defender of Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
Five-and-a-bit months after the Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published in Case C-125/14, [here, with Katnote here] in Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has delivered its decision, in response to a request for a preliminary ruling from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék (the Budapest Municipal Court).The facts of the underlying dispute are as follows. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:27 am
By Eric Goldman Elsevier Ltd v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Although some have argued that Dookhan’s dry-labbing demonstrates the necessity of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Dec 2024, 3:43 am
Iron & Coal Co., 265 U.S. 59, 67 (1924)). [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 8:29 am
It was the most important voting rights case since the Bush v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
It’s deliciously ironic to see a Trump pro-censorship garbage EO quoted to enjoin a subsequent pro-censorship garbage EO from him. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:20 am
In June 2006, we told you about a Supreme Court decision in a case called Burlington Northern v. [read post]
