Search for: "Jacobs v Grant"
Results 741 - 760
of 820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2008, 2:17 pm
The Third Circuit just issued its opinion in Gunvalson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 12:58 am
Many readers wrote to ask whether there existed a transcript of the powerful speech delivered by Lord Justice Jacob at the European Commission's public meeting last week on the preliminary report of the Inquiry into the Pharma Sector (see IPKat post here). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:28 pm
” The second new case the Justices granted is a government appeal, U.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
In Sobol v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:54 pm
Could the "somewhat" be that a majority of non-IP judges in this decision got it wrong and our own Jacob LJ got it right ...? [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:40 pm
The traditional common law position, represented by cases such as National Trust v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
Sure enough, the docket in that case, Jones Day v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
See Weinberg v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 8:12 pm
Not long ago, the Supreme Court decided to grant certiorari in the MeadWestvaco v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:43 pm
Yet another installment in Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward and friends (and it's not the last one either). [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 2:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
Thus, as a matter of law, Aris did not have a duty of care to the Clarks and the trial court properly granted summary judgment in Aris's favor.Jacob Jones v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 2:28 pm
Jacob LJ questioned whether the expert was in fact an expert on confusion between trade marks (as opposed to on branding) and on whether it was evidence at all, or merely assertion. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:31 pm
The CA v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
We agree, and, for the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the district court's grant of Baxter's motion for summary judgment and REMAND the case for trial. 08a0243p.06 2008/07/03 Jacob v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
We agree, and, for the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the district court's grant of Baxter's motion for summary judgment and REMAND the case for trial. 08a0243p.06 2008/07/03 Jacob v. [read post]
