Search for: "John Doe 2 "
Results 741 - 760
of 12,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 1:25 pm
I claim the doctrine of separability and the distinction between substantive and procedural arbitrability should be abolished, and that this amendment does so. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
. - As does happen, The Prof can flub. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:31 am
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register under Sections 1, 2, and 45.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:33 am
See, for example, other TTABlog postings here, and here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 3:16 am
The inclusion of the generic term COFFEE in applicant's mark does not alter the Section 2(e)(2) analysis. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:53 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:12 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:01 am
A recent audit, released by City Comptroller John Liu, announced these discoveries after a 2-year-old Bronx child nearly died from falling from a 5th floor window without window-guards. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:58 am
I wrote a paper about these hurdles (here) in 2004.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 4:28 am
The Board reversed an "ornamental" refusal to register the design mark shown below for vehicle tires, finding that the PTO Examining Attorney had failed to make a prima facie case that the mark is merely ornamental and does not function as a trademark (Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Trademark Act). [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:41 pm
What Does It Do? [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 2:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 8:59 pm
But that does not fund the Iraq Debacle. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:37 pm
How does it compare historically to other recoveries? [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 3:41 am
It doesn't seem so, at least not with regard to the PTO's establishing its prima facie case that the mark is a not so rare as to fall outside the scope of 2(e)(4).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:33 am
There is full personal liability and a sole proprietor cannot escape that. 2. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 4:30 pm
The baby -- my older son, John -- was less than 2 months old, so he took no interest in my ordeal and went about his baby-business as usual.But maybe you are studying with a baby who's a little older, like this one, who, I'm told, spontaneously dug the Constitution out of a schoolbag and started reading it:Good luck to all the law students who are studying with babies! [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:22 pm
Original Post by Brian Tamanaha at Balkinization.2. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 12:45 pm
(Baylor Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, p. 368, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
