Search for: "Johnson v. The State of Texas" Results 741 - 760 of 1,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2012, 3:20 pm by Charles Johnson
  Like these other states, Texas no long utilizes the term “rape” in its Penal Code. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:47 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Tygart | Texas Federal Court Will Hear Lance Armstrong Case on August 10, Disputing, July 18, 2012 Armstrong v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Charles Johnson
Houston Criminal Lawyer Charles Johnson provides a strong defense to conspiracy charges at both the state and federal level. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
In 1935, she became the 1st woman state district judge in Texas, a judgeship to which she was repeatedly re-elected. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
University of Texas — for Wednesday, October 10. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/LPLQcg (Bob Ambrogi) Model Behavior: Federal and State Court Rules on eDiscovery - - http://bit.ly/Mk6eHa (Jessica Mederson) Phase 2 of Discovery Pilot Provides Glimpse into Future of eDiscovery – - http://bit.ly/Oxc1V6 (BLLAWG) Robots Are Not Replacing eDiscovery Lawyers - http://bit.ly/MkKifa (Jason Krause) Rules for eDiscovery Vendors in D.C.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney)… [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm by Guest Blogger
Texas is only one of eleven states that have passed restrictive I.D. legislation over the past two years. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:02 am by Matt Murphy
President Lyndon Johnson signed the historic law in 1966 at his ranch in Texas. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
The judgment in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:33 am by William A. Ruskin
The Texas Supreme Court rendered judgment in favor of Centocor, Inc., the pharmaceutical manufacturer subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, in a landmark decision involving the learned intermediary doctrine, Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:33 am by Christy Unger
Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978) (Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require that a sentencer in a capital case not be precluded from considering and giving effect to mitigating factors); Johnson v. [read post]